Fridays Paperback m

audiobooks online

fiction books australia
Cambridge Massachusetts 2001. Four young altar boys are killed and mutilated in a similar manner within a short period of timeCall within a few miles of each other. Are these murders the mark of a serial killer? Are they somehow linked to an unsolved similar murder that happened twenty years ago involving Seminarians the Catholic Church and a cover up by the Boston Archdiocese possibly even the Vatican? Were the altar boys killed because they knew something that would be damaging to the Catholic Church if their secret were to be exposed? Dr. Anna Morrill a psychiatrist with a specialty in forensic psychiatry and the criminal mind becomes unwittingly involved in the mystery. Lieutenant Mick Thompson and the Cambridge police force enlist her help in profiling the killer of the young boys in a race to solve the crimes before more victims are found. Comments (0)

Northern State – live @ Criminal Records

Posted on 10th September 2010 by NZ News in news - Tags: , , , , , , , ,

buriedalive26 said on 10/Sep/2010@7:16 pm. the song is called mic tester not can i keep this pen

Here is the original post:
Northern State – live @ Criminal Records

Gangs see NZ as soft underbelly

.

New Zealand is seen as a soft target by gangs, which launder millions of dollars through this country, says the head of an Australian police unit set up to combat Melbourne’s criminal underworld. .

New Zealand needed to target organised crime rings, or risk reaching a crisis point of its own, he said.

Mr Edwards heads the Purana Taskforce, set up after a “crisis” of gangland killings in Melbourne, on which the television drama Underbelly was based. You will get shootings, you will get killings – if you do nothing about it. “Hopefully you realise that you need to stop it before the problems start. She said examples included:

Killer Beez gang owned the hip hop record label Colourways.”

Police Minister Judith Collins told the conference gangs had infiltrated businesses, and turned legitimate enterprises into money-laundering outlets.

– Gangs increasingly attended public and community celebrations, projecting themselves as harmless groups with a strong community spirit. Its music videos were thinly disguised recruitment advertisements for the gang and played on mainstream television.

– Gangs partnered with businesses in finance, transport, private security, entertainment, real estate and various trade-related industries. They had run lotteries, and uniformed police had been sent to oversee the draws.

Mrs Collins said gangs existed to make money and gain power, and their new level of sophistication was presenting a serious challenge. These partnerships help facilitate their real businesses – violence, extortion, drug-dealing and money-laundering.

Mr Edwards cited one of his taskforce’s cases, the busting of a cannabis-growing operation run by an organised gang.

But the Criminal Proceeds Recovery Act, which made possible the seizure of any assets that were probably gained illegally, would help dismantle organised crime.5 million was found to have been sent to New Zealand bank accounts from Australia. A$2.

Police Association president Greg O’Connor said the drug trade here was already leading to money-laundering and violence by organised groups. It was then sent to Vietnam and its value eventually returned to Australia in the form of drugs.”

Police tackling organised crime needed to be tasked with targeting those at “the highest level”, he said, but that could mean no tangible results in the short term. “All the things he’s talked about are already here.

.

Money-laundering – by which criminals try to hide the origin of money or property gained illegally – was the result of gangs making large sums from the methamphetamine trade and needing to find legitimate places for it

Chauvel wants provocation removed as defence

.

Gay Labour MP and former lawyer Charles Chauvel is spearheading a bid to remove provocation as a defence in criminal cases. .

But now Mr Chauvel has drafted a bill to get the defence of provocation removed.com website.

It was an “aspect of our criminal law which provides justification for lashing out and violence against people,” he told the GayNZ.”

He claimed there was strong support for the move and said the current “provision is a travesty.

The partial defence of provocation “lets people know they can get away with murder, and it’s time we did away with the provision.”

The Law Commission released a report in 2007 which said the partial defence of provocation should be abolished.

The report said the defence was originally used to avoid the mandatory life sentence for murder.

The recommended changes to the Crimes Act 1991 would allow such factors to be weighed in as aggravating and mitigating factors during sentencing rather than in setting the charge.

The report said the partial defence of provocation is “irretrievably flawed” because it claims to be a partial excuse, assumes there can be a loss of self-control, and that in extreme circumstances an ordinary person, when provoked, will resort to homicidal violence. However, under the Sentencing Act 2002, a life sentence is no longer mandatory.

-