.
Regional councils, including Environment Canterbury (ECan), could be axed if a drastic move foreshadowed by a specialist government panel gains momentum.
The possible abolition of regional councils and a recommended review of their effectiveness and efficiency comes from Environment Minister Nick Smith’s technical advisory group. It is part of the Resource Management Act (RMA) streamlining process.
The advisory group believes that, after the regional councils’ 20 years of existence, it is the “appropriate time for a reappraisal” of their performance.
A local government source said Smith was “surprised” at his advisers’ idea.
In their report, Smith’s advisers suggested a move from a three-tier resource management system national, regional and district-city to two tiers.
The Government wants to establish an Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) to strengthen support for environmental governance at national level.
The “functions and activities” carried out by regional councils would then be split between the new authority, working from regional offices, and city and district councils.
Smith’s press secretary said the minister had noted what was in the group’s report, but no work had been done on it.
Doctoral research from Massey University had suggested regional councils were “adding little public value” to environmental management, the advisers said.
Environmentalists say regional councils have been hamstrung as a result of a lack of policy guidance and support from central government.
Local Government Minister Rodney Hide is distancing himself from the idea, saying it was National Party policy “to explore an EPA instead of regional councils”.
It said that while ECan had worked hard to address agriculture and water conflicts, that had led to “great difficulty” in progressing water issues of its regional plan and public concern over inadequate environmental protection. .
“It is not clear that elected regional governance and the associated cumbersome processes of public participation have been particularly useful in protecting the people of Canterbury,” the advisers said.
“It is not clear that elected regional governance and the associated cumbersome processes of public participation have been particularly useful in protecting the people of Canterbury,” the advisers said.
ECan chairman Sir Kerry Burke said the group’s “gratuitous suggestion” had stunned many in the sector.
Ad Feedback –>
loadAd(’300×250′,’STORYBODY’,300,250);
“It is important to remember that elected councillors have an important role in local decision-making and that this is an underlying theme of the Resource Management Act,” it said. They give it perspective and democratic accountability.
“Regional councils give a scale you don’t get with territorial authorities.
Environmental Defence Society chairman Gary Taylor said the EPA taking over regional council functions was a possible scenario in phase two of the reforms. We’re just starting to hit our straps,” he said. “There needs to be a lot more work done before you could justify something as drastic as that.
“It’s the big sleeper,” he said.
“I think there are questions about the performance of some of the rural regional councils. You can’t make that kind of major change without a proper evidence basis.
“In the relatively long life of the RMA, which contemplated a number of national policy statements, there’s only ever been one issued coastal.
“In the relatively long life of the RMA, which contemplated a number of national policy statements, there’s only ever been one issued coastal.”
Green Party co-leader Russel Norman said little coherent direction for regional councils through the 1990s and early 2000s meant the RMA’s rollout was not as effective as it should have been.
“We need to be extremely wary of what is being proposed and examine it closely to see if it will improve environmental performance. [The group's] first round of advice was very anti-environmental and they will be providing advice on phase two.”